Arizona vs. Todd Greene (Jennifer Terpstra "Harassment" case)

Todd of ROA is also fighting a wrongful "harassment" charge from accuser, Jennifer Terpstra. She is the woman who was friends with Tiffany Bredfeldt (of Bredfeldt vs. Greene civil cases), befriended Todd, then turned around and testified AGAINST Todd.

According to him, Todd has not seen or contacted Jennifer in years. His "crime" is that he wrote disagreeable opinions ABOUT Jennifer. This is the same woman who issued multiple copyright strikes to Todd's Wordpress account resulting in the takedown of the blog. Todd was overwhelmed by Jennifer's copyright strikes on his Wordpress account, and like a deer in headlight, failed to respond quickly or correctly. That is a separate issue from the bogus criminal harassment charge.

The case that was opened on behalf of accuser Jennifer Terpstra is easily found in the Tucson City Court (TCC) docket. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/courts/court-defendant-search

TCC Court Case #: M1041CR16001490
LEA Case#: 1511010169

There are two counts of alleged online harassment.

Ct Citation# Date Charge Code / Description Disposition
1 6906991 1/5/2016 13-2921A (M1) HARASSMENT
2 6906991 1/5/2016 13-2921A (M1) HARASSMENT

This is what has occurred thus far:

Date Seq Description Amount Result
1/5/2016 1 3509282 CITATION FILED CITATION FILED
4/7/2016 3 3509307 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED ON 04/29/2016 AT 10:00AM IN JUDGE CRANSHAW - COURT RM 6 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET
4/12/2016 4 3538355 RESPONSE FILED RESPONSE FILED
4/18/2016 5 3585954 CONTINUE REQUESTED CONTINUE REQUESTED
4/25/2016 6 3650420 MOTION FILED MOTION FILED
4/28/2016 9 3711598 RESPONSE FILED RESPONSE FILED
5/13/2016 10 3756279 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED ON 06/27/2016 AT 9:00AM IN JUDGE CRANSHAW - COURT RM 6 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET
6/27/2016 14 4041045 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED ON 08/08/2016 AT 9:30AM IN JUDGE CRANSHAW - COURT RM 6

There was a pretrial conference a couple of days ago (June 27, 2016) and there is another one scheduled for August 8, 2016.

I don't know much about Todd's public defender or the judge in this case. But I have to believe that Todd can win this case also given the fact that Todd has had no contact or communications with Jennifer. It is a little tough to harass someone if you don't visit or communicate with another person. But we shall see if he is really going to be convicted for writing his grievances ABOUT her.

Comments

  • edited July 2016
    That "directed at" element is being defined by many courts as contact. I. E. emailing the person. Hopefully his lawyer does his due diligence in the issue and argues his case well.

    http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/13/02921.htm
  • That's ridiculous. These judges shouldn't have the authority or power to interpret the law based on their perspective of what they think it should be. It is what it is for a reason. This is unrestrained bias. Without impunity, they would be much more cautious in their rulings and what they actually allow to become a "case" in their court room.
Sign In or Register to comment.